The Underdogs

There are some shows, whether they are on big networks with overflowing supply of money, or simply an effort by the channel to get some more viewers, that just don't get enough credit.  I acknowledge the fact that most shows that have originality and are genuinely well done are well recognized.  But there are so many that just don't make the cut.  Maybe a nomination once in awhile, but never a win.  These shows have the talent, but not the street cred.  They put in the work, but they aren't getting the grades they strive for.

Underdogs of the television world are often seen as "not good enough." If not winning an Emmy every year, they are just not as good.  But it's all a matter of opinion.  Many people fail to look at the idea that some shows just don't have the budget or the resources that others have.  Some have great writing but not the best actors. Others have great actors, but not the best writing.  When I look at these so called underachievers, I don't see failure or inadequacy. No, I see potential.  A word I probably mention far too much.  Television is bursting with potential. Writers are just trying to make a name for themselves.  They write with a vigor to make their protege shine.  And when it doesn't, it gives the whole show a feeling as if it's hopeless.  Maybe not to the viewers, maybe no to writers, but the aura it presents shines with hopelessness.

I think that's why shows don't always prosper, even when they are doing well.  As they continue with their seasons, the less they are recognized, the less it becomes meaningful.  It evolves from a project to a job. I just want to urge everyone, whether you are a fan of television or not, to give every show a chance.  I know it's difficult at times, but it's really what lets the business prosper, when the audience keeps and open mind and enjoys it for what it is.  It may not be good, it may not be bad, but you won't know until you try it.  Try the green eggs and ham, I know I will.